The Rebooted Reality

It’s Hannah

gadreel-the-angel:

I mentioned before that Gadreel couldn’t have won a fight against dozens of angels considering the fact the Dean could beat him unconscious. He couldn’t have done it, at least not alone (if he did at all). It was accepted that Gadreel was the one to kill those angels based on three things

1) Hannah’s word

2) Metatron’s word

3) Gadreel looking for ingredients 

So I propose that Metatron had Gadreel set up the trap (or maybe even just get ingredients) and had Hannah (who would be one of his minions) kill them and wait for Castiel. OR if you want Gad to be more evil, he could still actually take part in the murder spree, but he would still need help. 

The point is: Don’t trust Hannah

More Gadreel-y stuff under the cut

Read More

Well….Gadreel was tied up with special angel dampening chains and also, had just been sliced up with an angel blade when Dean beat him up.  Dean’s beat up demons in similar ways before, and we’ve seen demons do some real damage.  It’s all about the circumstances.  A free, powerful angel can destroy a lot of angels, but a weak angel, rendered nearly human can be beaten up easily.  Also…we don’t know what the mark of cain is all about yet.  It might be starting to give Dean weird demon strength or something.

Just thought of this…

daniqueeninabox:

If Metatron just gave Cas the knowledge of everything he’s ever read or watched in the past two millennia then he has EVERY TABLET INSIDE HIS HEAD. How to defeat Metatron is RIGHT THERE IN HIS BRAIN.

bridget-malfoy:

Just some of the awesome that is the Supernatural cast.

super-who-locked-in:

merlinsassbutt:

dxisybuchanan:

megamanectric:

balconyscene:

these-fading-scars:

I don’t understand because wasn’t Olaf’s actions of lighting the fire, almost melting and then trying to save her and act of true love and shouldnt that have unfrozen her heart?

oh shit

for real i was watching and i was really upset that they did this scene but still needed love to be romantic??

but also them carrying her all the way back to the castle to get her there couldn’t that count as an act of love too??

It’s because the act of love had to be by Anna, not for her.

image

(Source: kisedbyfire, via indecisivehannahk)

flutiebear:

archdrude:

The Amazing Connections Between the Inca and Egyptian Cultures 

"The ancient Egyptians (in Africa) and the ancient pre-Incas/Incas (in South America) evolved on opposite sides of the globe and were never in contact.

Yet, both cultures mysteriously possessed the same strikingly identical body of ancient art, architecture, symbolism, mythology and religion.

The Victorian era scholars, faced with this enigma, concluded that both cultures must have been children of the same Golden Age parent civilization, “Atlantis.”

Today, Egyptian/Inca parallels are not only being ignored by American and Western scholars, they’re being suppressed.

Many baffling and unsolved similarities link the ancient Egyptians and the ancient pre-Incas/Incas ― even though both cultures evolved on opposite sides of the planet, separated by oceans” Read More

NO.

NO NO NO NO NO.

For starters, these architectures resemble each other only superficially. Egypt is on a flood plain. Peru is in the Ring of Fire. One area has to worry about floods; the other, earthquakes. Thus their native cultures designed their buildings accordingly, with different shapes, materials, building processes/tools and construction techniques. Only the most superficial gaze sees these stone and adobe constructions and concludes that they’re “eerily similar”, presumably because all stonework is the same? I mean FFS the blocks aren’t even shaped the same or joined in the same patterns, unless you think there’s something spookily similar about people lining stone blocks up into a row, or into pillars with a slab on top.

Secondly, I can’t identify all the sites/artifacts in these pictures, but I see at the very least Qorikancha, Chan Chan, maaaybe Huaca del Sol and what appears to be a skull from the Colca region — meaning that the person who has assembled this photoset has cherry-picked from several hundred miles (and more than a thousand years!) of distinct, disparate archaelogical sites, geographies and culturesof “Pre-Inka” history in order to match a few photos of the Egyptian pyramids, which were built in the same general region. That’s some super-duper disingenuous bullshit right there.

Finally, the Pre-Inka and Inka cultures and dynastic Egyptian mythos and religions are nothing at all alike, unless you’re the sort of person that assumes all religions with multiple gods are the same. Which a lot of Eurocentric Victorians were. 

This photoset and the accompanying article is racist bullshit; it’s the archaeological equivalent saying all brown people look alike because they’re brown. I shouldn’t even be surprised that the article invokes research “suppression” and the concept of Atlantis to explain similarities that don’t even exist, save in a racist’s mind’s eye.

completeveestripped:

brownglucose:

ridge:

i love learning useless information 

nice

Lol. Must share this elsewhere.

completeveestripped:

brownglucose:

ridge:

i love learning useless information 

nice

Lol. Must share this elsewhere.

(via 50shadesofwinchester)

feralworks:


THEY WERE FIGHTING AND WERE ALL LIKE ARRRR IMMA GET YOU BITCH BUT THEN, WHAT, WHY IS THE FLOOR SO SPRINGY. BETTER TEST IT OUT.

Always reblog

feralworks:

THEY WERE FIGHTING AND WERE ALL LIKE ARRRR IMMA GET YOU BITCH BUT THEN, WHAT, WHY IS THE FLOOR SO SPRINGY. BETTER TEST IT OUT.

Always reblog

(Source: 4gifs, via hsquared95)